Comprehensive diagnostic guide for OBD-II U0374 Network/Module Communication Code

Short definition (context)

• U0374 is a network/communications DTC type in the OBD-II framework. U codes relate to data link and module-to-module communication on the vehicle's controller area networks (CAN or other data buses). The exact manufacturer description for U0374 can vary by OEM, but it generally indicates invalid data or a data integrity problem received from a module on the vehicle's network.

Important Notes

• give high-level definitions of OBD-II codes and the concept of network/communication (U) codes, but they do not provide OEM-specific definitions for U0374. Treat the description above as a generic, OEM-agnostic interpretation of U0374. Manufacturer descriptions may differ.
• For standardized code naming conventions, you can also consult GitHub repositories that catalog OBD-II codes. These sources help confirm that U codes are network-related. Always verify with the vehicle's service information (OEM) for exact wording and any vehicle-specific definitions.
• No NHTSA complaint dataset is included , so probability estimates for causes are and general patterns rather than published complaint frequencies. If you have access to NHTSA data, you can substitute those percentages accordingly.

Symptoms

Symptoms

• Inconsistent or lost data on multiple modules (e.g., dash gauges behave oddly, HVAC or infotainment glitches)
• Intermittent or permanent loss of communication to BCM, PCM, ABS, TCM, IPC (instrument cluster), or gateway/module-on-network
• Warning lights on dash (e.g., check engine, ABS, airbag, cruise control indicators) that may appear and disappear
• Cruise control or power accessories failing to engage or stay engaged, due to data-not-found on the network
• Harsh/erratic behavior when starting, with some modules not reporting data until after a cycle or two
• In some cases, a vehicle may not start or may go into limp mode if essential modules fail to communicate

Step-by-Step Diagnosis

Phase 0 - preparation and data gathering

• Retrieve all DTCs from all modules (not just the powertrain). Note any related or supporting U, P, B, or C codes.
• Record freeze frame data and any module-specific descriptions displayed by the scan tool (if provided).
• Confirm vehicle year, make, model, and any recent electrical/electronic work (modules replaced, wiring repairs, aftermarket devices). Note any warranty or OEM reflash history.
• Check battery voltage (ideally 12.6 V at rest; 13.5-14.5 V while running). Low voltage can cause spurious CAN errors.
• Confirm proper ignition sequence and that the ignition is on when performing scans.

Phase 1 - initial inspection and data map

• Inspect the vehicle's CAN/data bus network at a high level:
  • Visually inspect main harnesses and all CAN-related connectors for corrosion, bent pins, moisture, or signs of water intrusion.
  • Look for recent aftermarket devices that could interfere with the data bus (alarm systems, radios, remote starts, or wiring adapters).
• Identify likely ECU/gateway modules on the network (e.g., BCM, PCM, ABS, TCM, IPC, instrument cluster). Note any modules that were recently replaced or serviced.
• Determine if the vehicle uses multiple data networks or a gateway module; some U codes indicate cross-network data issues via a gateway.

Phase 2 - functional bus assessment

• Check the data bus health using a capable scan tool or oscilloscope:
  • Look for modules that fail to respond on the network; check for data frames that appear, then disappear, or show data frame timeouts.
  • If possible, log CAN_H and CAN_L activity during normal operation and during faults to identify irregularities.
  • Confirm proper bus termination at the physical layer (end-of-line termination resistors and no extra parallel terminations that could load the bus). Typical CAN networks use termination resistors at each end; total network impedance is designed for stable signaling.
• If your tool supports it, check for "bus-off" or "error-frame" states and identify which module messages are failing to be acknowledged.

Phase 3 - isolation and fault localization

• Method A - module isolation test:
  • Where feasible, perform a controlled isolated test by disconnecting suspected modules one at a time and observing whether U0374-related symptoms and CAN errors persist. If disconnecting a module clears the U0374 condition, that module or its interface is suspect.
  • Be mindful of interdependencies: disconnecting a module can cause other modules to report errors due to missing data, so interpret results carefully.
• Method B - bus isolation test:
  • If you have access to a scope or protocol analyzer, monitor the CAN frames while selectively introducing or removing loads (e.g., by using a known-good module to substitute temporarily). The goal is to identify which module's frames are not being acknowledged or are corrupt.
• Check for power/ground integrity on the suspected modules:
  • Use a multimeter or scope to verify stable 12V (or vehicle-specified supply) on module power pins and solid ground return.
  • Inspect ground points for corrosion or loose connections, especially on chassis grounds shared by multiple ECUs.
• Check for software compatibility issues:
  • OEMs sometimes issue software calibrations that rely on data from multiple modules. If one module has a mismatched/calibration-incompatible software version, data integrity on the bus can degrade.

Phase 4 - targeted repair actions
If the root cause is identified as one or more of the following, proceed with the corresponding repair approach:

1) Wiring/connectors and grounding

• Repair or replace damaged wiring harness segments leading to the implicated module(s).
• Repair or replace corroded or damaged connectors; reseat connectors firmly. Clean pins if appropriate with the correct contact cleaner and ensure no bent pins.
• Inspect and repair defective vehicle grounds and major ground points associated with the network (e.g., engine block to chassis ground).
• After repair, re-check bus integrity with a scan tool and confirm that modules begin communicating reliably.

2) Faulty module(s) or gateway

• If a specific module's behavior correlates with U0374 (non-responsive or producing corrupt data), consider reflash of the module with OEM software, or, if required, replacement of the module.
• Ensure replacement modules are coded/initialized per OEM procedures and matched to the vehicle (some systems require gateway re-learn or module-to-vehicle alignment).

3) Incorrect bus termination or impedance issues

• Verify the bus is correctly terminated only at the ends of the network. Do not duplicate terminations or mis-wire termination resistors that could disturb bus signaling.
• If a third-party aftermarket device has altered the network topology, revert wiring to OEM configuration and verify.

4) Power/voltage supply problems

• Fix any intermittent voltage drop or grounding issue that affects multiple ECUs or the gateway.
• Replace failing battery or alternator components if voltage is unstable under load.

5) Electrical interference or after-market devices

• Remove or isolate aftermarket devices that might cause bus contention, ground loops, or noise on the data lines. After removal, re-test for U0374 reoccurrence.

Phase 5 - validation and verification

• Clear the DTCs after the repair and perform a thorough drive cycle that includes:
  • Engine start and stop
  • Varied RPM and load
  • City and highway driving
  • Occasional data load changes (engaging/disengaging accessories)
• Re-scan for DTCs. Confirm that U0374 does not reappear and that related U and other codes do not recur.
• Validate key functions that depend on network data:
  • Instrument cluster accuracy
  • ABS/ESC status and wheel-speed data
  • Transmission operation (shift behavior if the TCM participates on the CAN bus)
  • Cruise control engagement
  • Other modules' reporting and operation (e.g., HVAC, infotainment)
• If the issue recurs intermittently, continue monitoring with a data-logging tool to correlate events with environmental or operational conditions.

Root-cause probability guidance (qualitative with approximate ranges)

• Faulty or failing module (including gateway) on the network: 25-40%

• CAN bus wiring/connector faults (opens, shorts, moisture, corrosion, loose pins): 25-35%

• Power/ground integrity problems (voltage drops, intermittent grounding): 10-20%

• Incorrect network topology or improper termination: 5-15%

• Aftermarket equipment or improper reprogramming (calibration/data mismatch): 5-10%

• Intermittent environmental interactions or sensor-specific anomalies: 5-15%

Safety Considerations

• Always follow safe electrical diagnostic practices. If you're performing any disconnections, disconnect the battery only if necessary and follow OEM guidelines for disconnecting power to certain modules.
• Use appropriate personal protective equipment and avoid shorting CAN lines to power rails or equipment ground.
• When performing bench or on-vehicle tests, ensure you're in a controlled environment and have a fire extinguisher available if you detect arcing or overheating during tests.
• Document all findings, test steps, and fixes. This helps with future diagnostics and OEM reflash or reprogramming when required.

Documentation and cross-references

• The diagnostic framework above is informed by general OBD-II code structure and network/case discussions:
  • Wikipedia: OBD-II - Diagnostic Trouble Codes
  • Wikipedia: OBD-II - Powertrain Codes
  • These sources discuss the concept that DTCs are generated by ECUs and that U-codes pertain to network/communication issues across the vehicle's data bus.
• For standard code definitions and to confirm the generic concept of U0374 as a network/communication issue, consult standard OBD-II code dictionaries and OEM service literature for the precise, vehicle-specific description.

This diagnostic guide was generated using verified reference data:

• Wikipedia Technical Articles: OBD-II

Content synthesized from these sources to provide accurate, real-world diagnostic guidance.

---